Sachin v. State Of Haryana And ORS
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.03 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-9451-2018 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9451-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.09.2019 Sachin ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:
Mr. Rajat Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the State has produced detailed Marks obtained by the petitioner, in a sealed cover, which has been opened, perused and on comparison with cut off 174 under General Category for the post of Clerk, the petitioner has obtained 169 marks, therefore, has not been able to come within the zone of consideration. In such circumstances, no cause of action survives in the present writ petition and accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 30.09.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No