High Court of Punjab and HaryanaITA/161/2016disposed of

Commissioner Of Income Tax Chandigarh v. M/S Improvement Trust Bathinda

2025-11-17Mrs. Justice Lisa Gill,Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda17 pages

"#$% $

$& '

" ! ( )

" ! + +

" ! * ,,

" !

- .#/"

0 "%1 / .#/"

0 20" "

$% &'( $(

$)$*$&'( +

$, &'

-$./. 01./

$!(

- $230455 01.6 -$0/ 01./ 777 20" 3" 8

4 55&&6 5 7 758&3

4&964:586:56;3#4&3

3 )3+ ,,

* 4 55&&6 57

758&3 4&964:<586:56;3 44&#66&3 !&= 9 8 9

$$$-$./. 01./$ 0$ !

( 0/1 .5/. :: ;.$1<$01.6

$$$$:$ 8

$ ;$ + 8 = +

! "

% &

(

% &(

% &

" #))#

# '

" '

+,- .-

*" # 0

# *" +,- #1 $ .

- #

#1 $ # "

2 ."

- #

#1 $

& %3 %4 &( "

"5 &(

- #

.6!

71 &89 & #

:1&&1&(

% ; #

$ 71 9<< &9 #

&1:1&9'

3$ 8 $$

?8+ .500 :.500:$ ./$1<$01.1 +

( .0 +$$ $.0$1/$011;$ 6$ : 8

0.6 + 8'@ 011<+$$ $1.$13$0115$ /$ ( 0.6 = 8+#> A0.6 B 8

C + +

8? ' 8? 8

'# + #

" "

" 0

" # = 2$

+ + +

01$1/$01.0 >

+ +'

( .0 8 $ <$ ' $ ' + 9 8? >

+ $ +

8 >

8 D

+ 8 $$ $$ >

+ 8

+ ( 0.6 + 01$12$01.0$ 5$ + 8 8

+ .<$.0$01.0$

* .1$

8' >

1/$1<$01.3 8

9 + ( 0.6 +$$ $1.$13$0115+ .500$

#> EE EE EE

% &

1 1

&0 <

1 7

# 1 %

/ "1

EE EE EE ..$

;.$1<$01.6+ >

$ 8

-$2;0

01.; '

0115>.1$ 8 8

+ 8' 8

: $ 8

+ '

( .0; + $ + 8 '

+ 8

+8?

$ .0$ 8

$ .;$

8 = +

8 8 8 #> F

( 0.6

8'@ 011< G F 8

G F $ $$

( .0; ( 0.6 G .3$ *

+ 8 : 8

( 0.6

1.$13$0115$ +

9 8 $ >

+ 8 8' >

$! + %

# $% .6$ 8

+ 8 '8' +

) >

$! + (

&' (

) "*% $

# $ %+ &, & - & , .

* /!

# " (

""*

# $ $ ./$

+ 8

+ 0

- & ,

& !

% *

.2$

8' %

+ 3 4

# $% .<$

+ 8

$$8'

+ 8

D 8 $

8 '

'' +

$8 + D

8 '

$!8 8'

+ >

+ '8 '8'$ +

( .0

' = $F

8'!

' >

8 8

- & , 8 $

+ 3 45 $ .5$ + >

+ !

$ 01$

+ 8 >

$ + 8

#> #

41>1(8

# 4 "

71 9<0 1<1> "

# 1 "

# &>1:

;

?2" % =

?@ +" = # 4 "

71&>0 (1&1:

; "

&1(

$ ?+ -

= A 4 "

71:& &1&1>

1 ?$"

= "

B1 C1

4*# @ 7 @"

" 7 @"

" 40 2 0 A 4 "

71 : (1<1>

1 "

# ?% # ; = &8

41 3 $

A 4 "

71 9> 81>1>

1 "

# ?$ =

# " D

D" $

0 2 0

41 891>8 ; # 4 "

718

41 ; # ;

71&&98 91<1:

# ;

&& B1 1 #"

41 91

1 891>8 # 4 "

718 (&1>18

?4 # = #

# @") 2 ) D)@11 40

41&189

# 4 "

719& (&1&1>

- 41 ;

- -" =

" 0 # 4 "

1 >& (&1&11 * ;

?# 4

F "

(> B1 1

1 ;

?+"

= "

&> B1 1 ! 7 "

# 4 "

71(0 (181<1 $

41 ;

71G1;

&1&&1& B"

+-264

" 1 D

# "

1 @

41&1 ;

?- " = 2 # 4 "

71&&0 &9191:

" 1 ;

7= 2

7 2" 9<1

1 B ;

= 8 "

(>19 B1

41 (18:

;

# # 4 "

71& &&1&1:

" "

" E) &

?+" "

# =

2 +"*

;

" 25% ()9 90:0:(5) 9) >0(985) )8 &0&(0:85) 8):

(80(<0&985) :)> &0<:0<5) 0.$

8' $

' 8

( .. '+

8 D

8+ 8 $ >

'8' 8 8

$= ' ''

8= '

'> 8

$ + +'8' + 8

+ +

+ $ +

$ =

9 '8' 88'

$ +

( .0 '+

+ 8 8

$ 00$

3 4

?8'

$ = 8+# XX XX XX "72. The Tribunal rightly rejected the contention that to fall within the ambit of the words " advancement of any other object of general public utility" the trust must necessarily be involved only in implementing poverty alleviation programs or doing other acts of charity. It is sufficient if it does precisely what the last category in Section 2(15) states namely being involved in activities for the advancement of an object of general public utility. They include a proper systematic development of certain areas. These activities are by virtue of the PTI Act undertaken by this assessee.

73. The Tribunal also rightly held that an object of general public utility does not necessarily require the activities to be funded or subsidized by the State. So long as the objects fall within the ambit of the words "object of general public utility," it is sufficient. The achievements of those objects do not have to be as a result of State funding or State subsidy. The Tribunal accordingly rightly held that the authorities were not justified in denying the benefit of section 11 and holding that the assessee was not covered by the words "advancement of any other object of general public utility" in Section 2(15). The Tribunal, therefore, rightly directed the Assessing Officer to delete disallowance of exemption.

74. It cannot possibly be suggested that the Government of Punjab formed the trusts under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 because it wanted to carry on the business as colonizers or developers under the mask of the category "objects of general public utility".

75. Section 28(2)(iii) of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 permits a scheme under this Act to provide inter-alia for the disposal of the land vested in or acquired by the trust including by lease, sale and exchange thereof. This, however, is not the predominant activity or responsibility of the trust. Nor for this assessee is making profits from this activity its predominant motive.

76. The power of the assessee to dispose of land conferred by Section 28(2)(iii) is not an absolute or independent power. It is conferred upon the assessee in the discharge of its statutory duties imposed on it by the PTI Act of framing schemes. Sub section (1) of Section 28 entitles the assessee to combine the various schemes referred to in Chapter-IV. Sub section (2) stipulates that the scheme under the Act may provide for a variety of things including the disposal of land belonging to the assessee. This power is, therefore, in furtherance of, connected with and in relation to a scheme in Chapter-IV. It is not an absolute power independent of and unconnected with the assessee's statutory functions under the PTI Act.

77. The predominant activity of and the purpose for the establishment of the assessee is summed up in two words "town improvement" in the title "Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922." The preamble is titled "An Act for the improvement of Certain Areas." The preamble states "whereas it is expedient to make provision for the improvement and expansion of towns in Punjab." The Act in general and Chapter-IV thereof in particular indicates the reason for and the basis of the establishment of the trust. Almost every section in the Chapter indicates clearly that the trust is established for the purpose of "advancement of the object of general public utility." This is the predominant purpose of the trust.

78. The language of the provisions of the Act are self explanatory in this regard. The trust must deal with the

( buildings unfit for human habitation, the danger caused or likely to be caused to the health of the inhabitants of the area on account of the congested conditions of streets or buildings or want of light, air, ventilation or proper conveniences in an area and sanitary defects. The trust is required to frame the street schemes to lay out new streets, thoroughfares and open spaces or alter existing streets whenever it appears to the trust that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of providing building sites or remedying defective ventilation or creating new or improving existing means of communication and facilities for traffic.

79. The trust must also prepare development schemes. This duty contained in Section 24 is not akin to that of a private developer or a colonizer as wrongly suggested by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A). The development scheme under section 24 is prepared for the purpose of development of a locality. Sub section (2) of Section 24 provides that the trust may if it is of the opinion that it is expedient and for the public advantage to promote and control the development of and to provide for the expansion of a municipality in any locality adjacent thereto within the local area of such trust prepare "an expansion scheme."

The development scheme, therefore, is for the public purpose of development of any locality and an expansion scheme is also prepared when it is expedient and for the public advantage as opposed to a mere personal advantage as in the case of private developers or the colonizers. The two cannot possibly be compared. These schemes do not contemplate mere development of the plots and the construction of the premises for sale. The Trust must under the Act adopt a holistic approach for the betterment and advantage of the entire area within its jurisdiction.

80. Section 25 which provides for a housing accommodation scheme to be framed is similar. The trust is required to frame such a scheme if it is of the opinion that it is expedient and for

+ the public advantage to provide housing accommodation for any class of inhabitants within its local area. The trust is, therefore, to be motivated not by personal but by public benefit. Such activities clearly fall within the last category of cases in the proviso to Section 2(15) as it stood at the relevant time, namely, "advancement of an object of general public utility."

81. It can hardly be suggested that the Government of Punjab established the assessee's trust and conferred upon it public responsibilities and duties of the nature specified in the PTI Act as a camouflage for its commercial, trade and business ventures. The creation and incorporation of the trust under section 3 is for a public purpose. We have no doubt whatsoever that the activities of the trust fall within the meaning of the words " charitable purpose" in Section 2(15).

82. Whether the mandate of the Act is followed by such a trust is a different matter. The facts in that regard are relevant in examining whether the activities of the trust of a given year entitled it to the benefit of the Income Tax Act. Mere profit making on account of certain incidental or ancillary activities of the trust do not disentitle it to the exemptions. The Trust constituted under the PTI Act is likely to make profit on account of its commercial or business activities such as when it acts pursuant to the power under section 28(2)(iii) by disposing off its lands. That, however, does not take it out of the definition of 'charitable purpose' in Section 2(15) . As we held earlier, trade, commerce and business in Section 2(15) must be such as to involve an element of profit.

Profit, however, is not the predominant motive of such trusts. In our view considering the nature of the Act, selling of plots and premises by the trust is only incidental and ancillary to its main purpose which at the cost of repetition is "town improvement" in almost every respect.

* commercial or business venture per se but one necessitated on account of the implementation of the provisions of the trust through statutory schemes. The main purpose of such schemes is driven by public requirements and not as a commercial venture per se. They are incidental to the main object of the trust.

83. In the present case, the Assessing Officer has not indicated any facts which indicate that the assessee deviated from this principle. He has merely referred the extent of profit making activities without correlating the same to the other activities of the trust. In our view, therefore, the order of the Tribunal must be upheld.

(emphasis supplied) EE EE EE 0;$ 8'

5 $

+ 9

8' 8

+ 8

+ $ 03$

+ 8

8? >

$ 06$

'8' 8

$ ! &' (

) &, & - & , . 5 +

$ 0/$ '

+ 8 8' '

0<5 $ + (

' '+ 8

0<5 $ 02$

(

5 8 (

+ +

+ '

( .001 $(

+ ' 8

( .101 $ 0<$ 8>

$ 05$

+ 0

- & ,5 $ ;1$ 8

- & ,5 + 8 I

4) $ +

+ = + ' 8 = +$ 8

+ 8 $ +

+ 8?

8 '$ 8 8'

+ 3 45 $ ;.$ -

= '+ ' $- '

) + 8 89 8

$ '8

8' >

.500$

+ 88'

$ ;0$ +

( .0; 8 8

8' >

8 +

$ ;;$ = + + ' 8' $

"%1 / "

$ 20" "

* *

C 7