Suman v. Sudhir Kumar



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.116 TA-996-2024 Date of Decision: 05.03.2025

 ....Applicant

Versus



 .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. S.S. Sahu, Advocate for the applicant.

None for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
 

 

    

             





!  




"#  

" !

    $%#& !    %   &  % 

'   ( !)  $ "

"*   + 

,!  %   "  

! *  -*  #!   %  "  !  

     

.     



It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 31.01.2016. One son born from the said wedlock, who is about 21⁄2 years old, is in the care and custody of the applicant. The applicant is residing at her parental place and she has Sonu 2025.03.05 17:36 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC

  no independent source of earning. She is totally dependent upon her parental family. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that it is difficult for the applicant to commute a distance of about 70 kilometres, to defend the divorce petition.

In view of the aforesaid fact situation, considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, more particularly, while the respondent has not come forward to contest the application and also taking into consideration the fact about the applicant to be taking care of the minor son, the transfer application is allowed and              



!  




"#  

" !    % $%# & !  !      &    % 

 '     ( !  ) 

$ " 
/    "

"# $%# & !!  )    0!$ "

. )    0!$ "!        $%#& 1&%& 2(  -* !     " $%#& 1&%& 2( !     %

% #



(ARCHANA PURI) 05.03.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.03.05 17:36 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC