Sarina Joshi v. Pardeep Joshi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO-290-2017 (O&M) Decided on : 18.10.2019 Sareena Joshi . . . Appellant(s)

Versus

Pardeep Joshi . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Argued by: Mr. Dinesh Nagar, Advocate for the appellant(s).

Mr. Ramneek Vasudeva, Advocate for the respondent(s).

**** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J.

The instant has been preferred by the wife - Sarina Joshi, against the judgment and decree dated 04th November, 2016, passed by the Ld. District Judge (Family Court), SBS Nagar, (in short 'Ld. Family below'), vide which the petition filed by her under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), for restitution of conjugal rights, was dismissed.

It would be pertinent to mention here that the respondenthusband also approached this Court by way of an another appeal i.e. FAO1689-2017, whereby, he had impugned the judgment and decree dated 04th November, 2016, passed by the Ld. Family Court, wherein, the petition filed by him under Section 13 of the Act, seeking dissolution of his marriage with the wife, was dismissed. Both these appeals were ordered to be heard together vide order dated 10th September, 2019, of this Court. Since the said appeal i.e. FAO-1689-2017, has been allowed JAWALA RAM 2019.10.23 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

FAO-290-2017 (O&M) - 2 - and the marriage between the parties has been dissolved by a decree of divorce vide order of even date of this Court, therefore, no separate orders are required to be passed in the present appeal. Consequently, the instant appeal is dismissed.

(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE October 18, 2019 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2019.10.23 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh