High Court of Punjab and HaryanaLPA/1798/2014dismissed

Union Of India v. Ch. Devilal College Of Ayurveda And ORS.

2015-01-15Ms. Justice Navita Singh,Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1798 of 2014(O&M) Date of Decision: January 15, 2015 Union of India .....Appellant versus Ch.Devi Lal College of Ayurveda and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.

Present:Mr.Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr.Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate with Mr.Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate, for the caveator-respondent.

-.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The order dated 06.10.2014 passed by learned Single Judge approving the intake of additional 10 seats, i.e., increase from 50 to 60 in the respondent-Ayurdeva College in BAMS course for the session 2014-15, is under challenge in this letters patent appeal at the instance of Union of India. The respondent-Institution being on caveat, it was informed by its learned counsel on November 04, 2014 that the order passed by learned Single Judge approving the increase of seats from 50 to 60 has been given effect by the State Government and the University and consequently, 60 students have already been admitted.

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.04 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

LPA No.1798 of 2014 (O&M) [2] The above-stated fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the appellant also.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the order passed by learned Single Judge. Since additional intake has been accorded by learned Single Judge keeping in view the notification dated 18.07.2012 issued by the Central Council of Indian Medicine (CCIM) and the respondent-Institutions have been found possessing the requisite facilities and infrastructure for 60 seats, it does not appear to be a fit case to interfere with the order passed by learned Single Judge.

Dismissed.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE January 15, 2015 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] Mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.04 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh