Karamjit Singh v. State Information Commissioner Pb & ORS

L.P.A.No.1468 of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A.No.1468 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Order: 06.10.2015 Karamjit Singh ..Appellant

Versus

State Information Commissioner, Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL

Present:

Mr. Talwinder Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.

RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) C.M.No.3147-LPA of 2015 Allowed as prayed for.

L.P.A.No.1468 of 2015 The appellant, challenges order dated 02.09.2015, dismissing his writ petition.

Counsel for the appellant submits that as the respondents did not furnish the entire information, the order dismissing his writ petition is incorrect on facts, particularly as respondent no.3 has not furnished information whether Vasika No.52, was registered on 04.04.1996 or 08.04.1996.

We have heard counsel for the appellant, perused the impugned order as well as orders passed by authorities under the Right to Information Act, 2005, but are not inclined to entertain the appeal. The information required by the appellant has been furnished. In fact a perusal of the paper book reveals that the NARESH KUMAR 2015.10.09 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

L.P.A.No.1468 of 2015 -2appellant has himself appended a photostat copy of the sale deed, which was incorporated at Vasika No.52. The appellant, cannot call upon the respondents under the Right to Information Act, 2005, to furnish inferential information as their jurisdiction is confined to furnishing information available with them.

The appeal is, consequently, dismissed.

(RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE October 06, 2015 (REKHA MITTAL) nt JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2015.10.09 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh