Havita Shree And ANR v. Bank Of Baroda And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9872-2018 Date of Decision: April 23, 2018 Smt.Havita Shree and another .....Petitioners

Versus

Bank of Baroda and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEKHER DHAWAN 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Aalok Jagga, Advocate for the petitioners. ........

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioners have already approached DRT-II, Chandigarh alongwith a stay application. The matter is now listed before DRT on 27.04.2018.

[2] In this view of the matter when the petitioners have already availed effective alternative remedy, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition and relegate the petitioners to continue to avail the said remedy. Since the Presiding Officer of DRT-II, Chandigarh is stated to be not holding Court till 27.04.2018, it is directed that status quo re: possession be maintained till 30.04.2018.

[3] With the directions and liberty above, the writ petition is disposed of.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE April 23, 2018 ( SHEKHER DHAWAN ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2018.04.23 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh