Sulakhan Singh And ORS v. Teja Singh

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.4957 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.10.2015 Sulakhan Singh and others ...Appellants

Versus

Teja Singh .....Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

Present:

None for the appellants.

RAJESH BINDAL, J.

The defendants are before this Court against concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the courts below, whereby the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell, was decreed.

The judgment of the learned lower appellate court is dated 1.9.2011. The appeal was preferred in this Court on 1.12.2011. Ever since the appeal was filed in the Court, the same is being adjourned either in the absence or on request of counsel for the appellants. The appeal was dismissed in default on 2.7.2015 and was restored on 5.8.2015. Today, the case was taken up twice, however, none has appeared for the appellants. As no arguments on merit have been addressed, the appeal is dismissed. For the purpose reference can be made to the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Poonam v. Sumit Tanwar, 2010 (4) SCC 460. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 15.10.2015 sharmila SHARMILA 2015.10.20 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Chandigarh