Preetvinder Kaur v. Gurpreet Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.122 TA-1003-2024 Date of Decision: 06.03.2025
....Applicant
Versus
.....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Vinod Kumar Kaushal, Advocate for the applicant.
None for the respondent.
***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
!"
#$
# " %&$' "(
& ' &
) #* +! ," & #
" * -* $" & # "
.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 28.10.2006. Two children born from the said wedlock, are in the care and custody of the applicant. Also, it is submitted that the applicant is unemployed and is dependent upon Sonu 2025.03.06 15:25 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC
her parental family. Even, she has filed the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., which is pending in the Courts at Hoshiarpur and the respondent is making appearance in the same. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that, while taking care of two children and having no source of earning, it is difficult for the applicant to commute a distance of about 100 kilometres, to defend the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. In view of the submissions aforesaid, considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, more particularly, considering the fact about the children to be residing with the applicant, who has no source of earning and also considering the fact about the respondent having not come forward to contest the application, the transfer application is allowed and
!"
#$
# " & %&$' "( "
' &
) /
#
#$ %&$' "( " 0 1" . 0 1""
%&$' "-* " # %&$' "" &
& $
(ARCHANA PURI) 06.03.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes Whether reportable :
Yes/No Sonu 2025.03.06 15:25 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC