Meenakshi And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

-1CRWP-9451 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9451 of 2022 Date of decision: 30.09.2022 Meenakshi and another ......Petitioners vs.

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ASHOK KUMAR VERMA, J. (ORAL) Through this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of a direction to respondents No. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent No.4 and 5, as they have solemnized marriage against the wishes of private respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the petitioners are major and they have right to live their life on their own terms. However, the private respondents are adamant to separate them from each other by resorting to illegal means. Learned counsel further submits that in view of imminent danger to the life and liberty of the petitioners, they have moved a representation dated 26.09.2022 (Annexure P-4) to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Panipat. Notice of motion to official respondents No.1 to 3 only at this stage.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Tanuj Sharma, Assistant RAVINDER SINGH 2022.09.30 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

-2CRWP-9451 of 2022 Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State and perused the paper book.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the petitioners are at liberty to live together being major and no person shall be permitted to interfere in their peaceful living as right to life is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India which mandates that no person shall be deprived of his right to life and personal liberty.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Panipat, to look into the representation dated 26.09.2022 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners seeking protection of life and liberty and if necessary, requisite steps be taken strictly in accordance with law for grant of protection of life and liberty of the petitioners It is, however, clarified that in case, there is any criminal case registered against the petitioners, this order shall not be construed as an impediment for the law enforcing agency to proceed against the petitioners, in accordance with law.

(ASHOK KUMAR VERMA) September 30, 2022 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2022.09.30 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment