Sanjeev Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 106 Civil Writ Petition No.20613 of 2024 Date of Decision: December 10, 2024 Sanjeev Kumar ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Haryana & others ..... RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA PRESENT: - Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral) The petition has been filed with a grievance that inspite of having been selected for the post of TGT English (ROH) cadre in response to advertisement 02/2023, the petitioner's name does not figure in the list of candidates selected for provisional appointment vide office order dated 28.07.2024, Annexure P-8.

2.

Learned State counsel on instructions received from the office of second respondent vide memo dated 10.12.2024, contends that the reason for not issuing posting order to the petitioner was an objection about his qualification that he had not studied English in all the three years of B.A. degree course. The matter was accordingly referred for experts opinion to the Kurukshetra University. As per report dated 21.11.2024, received from Assistant Professor, Department of English of the University, the petitioner fulfils the eligibility criteria for the post of TGT English as per Rules. The Department is in the process of issuing posting orders to him, which will be done within two weeks.

AVIN KUMAR 2024.12.11 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.

CWP No.20613 of 2024 [2] 3.

In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 4.

Ordered accordingly.

(Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge December 10, 2024 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2024.12.11 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.