Charanjit Kumar v. State Of Punjab & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-1253-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 19, 2016 Charanjit Kumar .....Appellant

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No 3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 4.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 5.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

.......

Present:

Mr.Manish Dadwal, Advocate for the appellant.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

Learned counsel for the appellant, after arguing the appeal at length, submits that inadvertently the claim with regard to payment of subsistence/suspension allowance to which the appellant was statedly entitled to, could not be raised before the learned Single Judge. He seeks and is permitted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to submit a representation to the competent authority for release of subsistence allowance during the period when the appellant was under suspension or shall be deemed to be under suspension. If such a representation is made, the competent authority is directed to consider and decide the same by way of a reasoned order within a period of four months from the date it is submitted. However, no claim with regard to the benefits which have been declined by learned Single Judge shall be entertained. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE Meenu 2016.10.22 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh October 19, 2016 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE