Sumer Singh And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-25842-2019 (O&M) Decided on :23.04.2024 SUMER SINGH AND OTHERS . .petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS . . . Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: Mr. Nikhil Lather, Advocate for Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1.

In the present petition, the only question raised is whether petitioners, who were promoted to the post of Clerk prior to 07.11.2013, when the Notification was issued by the respondent-State, were required to pass State Eligibility Test in Computer Appreciation and Applications (SETC) and whether the petitioner can be directed to pass the same. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said question of law has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while passing order in CWP No. 11842 of 2020 titled as Surinder Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 24.09.2020. 3.

Learned State counsel has not been able to rebut that the question of law raised in the present petition is covered in favour of the petitioners by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Surinder Singh and others' case (supra). Keeping in view the above, the present petition is also disposed of in same terms as in Surinder Singh and others' case (supra) and the impugned orders are quashed. RIYA 2024.04.25 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-25842-2019 (O&M) -22023:PHHC:054759 CM-10424-CWP-2020 :- Keeping in view the fact that the main petition is disposed of, the present application stands disposed of.

Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of.

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 23.04.2024 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RIYA 2024.04.25 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document