Neha Rani v. State Of Haryana And Another

113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24314-2021 Date of Decision: 01.12.2021 Neha Rani

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :

Dr. Khushbir Kaur Bhullar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional A.G., Haryana.

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider her case and select her for the post of clerk under ESP-SC category vide advertisement No.5/2019 (Annexure P-1), claiming that persons less meritorious than her have been selected.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that qua her aforesaid grievance, petitioner caused issuance of a legal Notice dated 11.10.2021 (Annexure P-10), the same has not been adverted by the respondents till date. Hence, the instant petition. 3.

Learned State counsel, on advance service, appears and submits that competent authority shall take appropriate decision on the pending legal notice dated 11.10.2021 (Annexure P-10).

4.

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

VANDANA 2021.12.02 22:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

5.

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to look into the grievance of the petitioner as per legal notice dated 11.10.2021 (Annexure P10) and also by keeping in view the contentions raised in the present petition by treating the same as supplementary representation and take a decision, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 6.

Disposed of accordingly.

01.12.2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No VANDANA 2021.12.02 22:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document