Mangat Ram v. Chief Canal Officer & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.252 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 13, 2015 Mangat Ram .....Appellant versus Chief Canal Officer/BWS, Haryana Irrigatrion and WR and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.

Present:Mr.B.S.Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal as he wants to move an application before the learned Single Judge on the ground that the appellant is willing for the proposal (a) mentioned in the report of the Chief Canal Officer (Annexure A-3).

Ordered accordingly.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE February 13, 2015 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] Mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.16 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh