Meenu Devi And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

S.No.109

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CRWP No.11335 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:02.12.2021 Meenu Devi and another .....Petitioners Vs.

State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR Present:- Mr. S.K. Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, AAG, Punjab.

(Through Video Conferencing) **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of a mandamus hence directing respondents No.1 to 4, to give protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners, and against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of respondents No.5 and 6. 2.

The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order representation Annexure P.5. 3.

Consequently, this Court directs respondents concerned, to within two weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P.5 through a speaking order.

4.

Petition is disposed of.

5.

A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of ususal charges.

December 02, 2021 ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RENU 2021.12.03 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh