Shilpa Taneja v. Bhuwan Khanna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.110 TA-1121-2023 Date of Decision:18.09.2024 SHILPA TANEJA ....Applicant

Versus

BHUWAN KHANNA .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- None for the applicant.

Mr. Sidharth Gautam, Advocate for the respondent.

(Appeared through video conferencing).

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) Despite second call, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant.

Even on the last date of hearing, none had made appearance on behalf of the applicant.

Seemingly, the applicant is not interested to pursue the transfer application. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed, for want of prosecution. (ARCHANA PURI) 18.09.2024 JUDGE
 Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Anu 2024.09.19 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document