High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/39267/2019allowed

Ranjeet Singh v. State Of Punjab

2020-02-05Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh2 pages

CRM-M-39267-2019 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.39267 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 04.02.2020 Ranjeet Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:- Mr. Satvir Singh, Advocate for Mr. J.P.S. Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Jagmohan Singh Ghumman, DAG, Punjab.

***** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J .(Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.205 dated 18.08.2019, registered under Section 306 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station City Muktsar, District Sri Muktsar Sahib.

At the time of issuance of notice of motion on 16.09.2019, following order was passed:- "It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the case against the petitioner is totally concocted. The petitioner even did not have any connection or any communication with the deceased during his lifetime. Still further, it is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is that he, alongwith others, used to force the deceased to indulge in drug trafficking, however, the petitioner has no concern even with any drug business, in any manner, whatsoever. It is also submitted that there GEETA RANI 2020.02.05 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-39267-2019 (O&M) -2has never been any case under NDPS Act against the petitioner.

Notice of motion for 05.02.2020.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C."

In compliance of the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and undertakes to join further investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Gurbaj Singh admits the same and states that the petitioner has joined investigation and is no more required in further investigation of the case.

In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, order dated 16.09.2019 is made absolute, however the petitioner shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

Petition stands disposed of.

04.02.2020 ( Raj Mohan Singh ) geeta Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No GEETA RANI 2020.02.05 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document