Pankaj v. Central Bank Of India Jind

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-20566-2025 Date of Decision: 06.08.2025 PANKAJ ...PETITIONER Vs.

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA JIND ...RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

Present:

Ms. Sapna Lather, Advocate for Mr. DPS Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate and Mr. Teginder Singh, Advocate for respondent-Bank.

**** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) 1.

It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was working with the respondent-Bank as Sweeper (daily wages), however, he has been dis-engaged by the respondent-Bank without following the procedure as laid down by the respondent-Bank. 2.

Prima facie the issue would thus pertains to an unlawful retrenchment/termination of services of the petitioner by the respondentBank which would be amenable to the remedy of the Labour Court. 3.

In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy available under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE 06.08.2025 Rahul Joshi Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAHUL JOSHI 2025.08.11 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD