Prem Singh v. State Of Haryana And Another
!"#$%"&'('#) * * +",-')./ ******"!'!'#)"+ 0"+(1( -! !"#$ +2 ) )% )#!/"+ ******* "(3#)%")!(
4 5
*-
-
!!!!
-
6*7
"
# $% &'( &() ** $ $
$ $+$ , (& -.
(-"/(& -.
(-"/"'
-) (-"/ ,0$ 1*$$ 2 2$% "3' 4
, 1$2 5 641 78 2 2
.-9 -& (-"92 2
9-& -.
(-"9 2 2
(("".
(-"9 # ,
#,39 ')!
-")!")&"
*2 * 2
. -9 -& (-"9 *1%4
&.)):(-"9 ;
$ 2 2 " $ 2 $ ; "'-----:< $22 *2 * 2
9 -& -.
(-"9 *1%4
.'-3:(-"9 ;
$ 2 2 " $ 2 ;
")----:< $22 %22 2 "92 $ 2 ;
".-----:< $22 *2 * 2
((" ".
(-"9 *1%4
""")&:(-"9
(
# , % 0$ $$ 2
2 "- -( (-((-( ""
(-((
# , 2 2 $ % "3' 41 $2,
# 2<%$
,$ , 2 2 ; .----:< (- -& (-". ; "-----:< -& -9 (-". 22$, $92 = 2 2$$ +$
&3&9"&-"
-3 (-"9 ; ".----:< #+$
$ 2 <6$$ 71 $ 2 2 2 2-& -.
(-"9
$
#
; "9-----:< 2 2< 2 $2 $.2 1 , $+$
3&()3' -& -( (-"9 ; ""-----:<+$
3&()(/-& -( (-"9 ; .-----:< 2 $
+$ $ 2 <6$$ 7#
2 2 $ 2 2 -9 -& (-"9
# ;
".-----:< 2 : 4 < 2 , 1 ,, $+$
9.9(/& -& -'
(-"9 ; ".-----:< = 2 +$ $ 2 < 6$ $ 7# 2 2 (3 -'
(-"9 $ 2 2 ".
(-"9 &
> $ 2 $ 2,
* $
* $ $ $$
$$,2 ,2 2
? # $$ (-". ,
2 2
$ $ $, $,
2 $ , 2 2 2 $$,2 2 2$ $
"'
.
% $ $ $ ,$
@$* $
$ 2 $ +$
$ $ , , 2 2$%
"3' 41 # , $ $ $ 2 #$ $ +$?2 % &3) * * $,
(1) When a person already undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is sentenced on a subsequent conviction to imprisonment or imprisonment for life, such imprisonment or imprisonment for life shall commence at the expiration of the imprisonment to which he has been previously sentenced, unless the Court directs that the subsequent sentence shall run concurrently with such previous sentence:
Provided that where a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment by an order under section 122 in default of furnishing security is, whilst undergoing such sentence, sentenced to imprisonment for an offence committed prior to the making of such order, the latter sentence shall commence immediately.
(2) When a person already undergoing a sentence of imprisonment for life is sentenced on a subsequent conviction to imprisonment for a term or imprisonment for life, the subsequent sentence shall run concurrently with such previous sentence.
)
0$ , 7,%$2* $-/2 , 9 )% 2 : !' "(#2 )% )#!/"+ 78 ** 7+',') 98 2
0*;* )( 9<*-! !"#$ +2 ) )% )#!/"+ 78 ** 7'<'98
,
$ * $$% &() * * $ $ ,?2 % $ 0$2;
, "14. The imperative essentiality of a single transaction as the decisive factor to enable the Court to direct the subsequent sentence to run concurrently with the previous one was thus underscored. It was expounded as well that the direction for concurrent running of sentence would be limited to the substantive sentence alone.
15. In a more recent decision of this Court in
! "
#$%
&'(
# &
) #$$* +", $ -
and the accompanying appeals, arising from the conviction of the appellant from his prosecution on the offences proved, this Court in the singular facts as involved and having regard to the duration of his incarceration and the remission earned by him, extended the benefit of such discretion and directed that the sentences awarded to him in those cases would run concurrently. It was noticeably recorded that the offences in the cases under scrutiny had been committed on the same day. The benefit of the discretion was accorded to the appellant therein referring as well to the observation in V.K. Bansal (supra) that it is difficult to lay down any straight jacket approach in the matter and that a direction that the subsequent sentence would run concurrently or not, would essentially depend on the nature of the offence or offences and the overall fact situation. Understandably, the appellant was required to serve the default sentence as awarded with the direction that if the fine imposed had not been deposited, the default sentence or sentences would run consecutively.
16. Reverting to the facts as obtained in the present appeal, we are of the comprehension, on an appreciation thereof as well as the duration of the appellant's custody, as is evidenced by the certificate to that effect, that the appellant is entitled to the benefit of the discretion contained in Section 427 of the Code. In arriving at this conclusion we have, as required, reflected on the nature of the transactions between the parties thereto, the offences involved, the sentences awarded and the period of detention of the appellant as on date."
'
# * $ 2 9 / )% <* 1)= > -! !" ? +"/#1('). #+3#+ !'#)61)= >6/ )%'. +/ )%!/"+( -)9')"@
)='!-')./<*-! !"#$1)= >
".
(-") -/ (/' /1(/ ) <* -! !" #$ +2 ) )% #!/"+( 7 8 **
7+',') 98 6
, 7,%$2* $
,$ $ # $ 2 2 $
"'2 * $ $
,2$, 2 2$
$ 4 , 2 , $22 2
/
1 , $
"-
2 $
7
-
* Ajay Goswami Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No