Pushpa Kumari v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50664-2021 Date of Decision: 07.04.2022 Pushpa Kumari ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that the charges have been framed and as such, in this petition, the petitioner does not challenge framing of charges. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in this Court.

The prayer being innocuous is not opposed by the learned State counsel. Given above, the present petition is disposed of having been withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. It is clarified that the time for which the present petition was filed and is pending before this court shall be excluded from counting the period of limitation.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 07.04.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.04.08 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document