← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/50086/2021allowed

Balwinder Kaur v. State Of Punjab And Another

2022-02-08Mr. Justice Amol Rattan Singh4 pages

-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 08.02.2022 Balwinder Kaur ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate, for the petitioner.

 

 Mr. Akashdeep Singh Mann, Advocate, for respondent no.2.

***** AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. (ORAL) ase heard via   

  !""#

$% &" # '#

"!   

!"" ()*

  

"" ! #  ! ,-.  )(     /       "

        # 

   0"

  1!

   

 

22""!

"

  ( 

-  ""

"! #

"+

"" ! # 

"

 .%% / ))%

  "2""

 #

" 

"

 "  4



-2- 2 2  .")+ "  "! 

 + !    "       2   "  ""

  

 . 5"!    0

  !

           "!        +"

      !!   !

  "!  2   ""!

 # "

 # "  

!

 ""

# ""!  

 6! 

 !

   !    

     "

  

  2

  2   "

7"

 #" 

" " 



 

  4          

"        

 8 Thereafter, on December 22, 2021 the following order had been passed by this court:-  

9

"!!  

!! %! ! 

   2   (    + )   





   

 

2

:2  .")  7%;   ""!

 # "



  "  

!

 ""

# ""!  

 < !"



!

! 

 "

 

  2

  2  "

 "

 #" 

" " 

 

"

 

" 2 " !  

 "

     

 "

2

 

 

=  += 

-3- ) >"

!

 !#

2  " :!# 4  % ;?  #

"

"

 "  """  '

" 2#  ""!  "

 2 "#

""! " 

!! "   

!"

"    

 

   +   

  2  

  +" 4 " %*  % 

2!#!  

'#

"!  

""=!% "

=  !,-.)( "

    #

  0"

 1!

  /  



22""!

"

 

!""  ( 

-  - 

 

   2

   2   #

      "

     !    "

@ ""

 #" 

" " 

 

4   

   /

8 Today Mr. Akashdeep Singh Mann, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2, submits that the money owed by the petitioner to respondent no.2 has been received by the said respondent and that therefore he has no grievance left with her.

Though Mr. Puri submits that a formal compromise needs to be drawn up and in that context he draws attention of this court to the order passed in the previous petition filed by the petitioner, wherein learned senior counsel appearing for respondent no.2 had stated that the matter would be compromised

-4between them, obviously that is not the scope of this petition and this court is not going into that matter, with the parties always at liberty to draw up any compromise that they wish to.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent no.2, the petition is allowed, with the order dated 01.12.2021 made absolute. CRM-43598 of 2021 This application seeking that the petitioner be admitted to interim bail, has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. February 08, 2022 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) dinesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No