Amar Nath v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Letters Patent Appeal No.2499 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 16, 2017 Amar Nath ......Appellant versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA.

*** Present: Mr.Anurag Goyal, Advocate, for the appellant. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J . (Oral) A self-speaking order has been passed by the learned Single Judge at the preliminary stage, while calling upon the respondents. We are satisfied that no letters patent appeal can be entertained against such order as the appellant cannot compel the learned Single Judge to pass an interim order which would, in a way, amount to allowing the writ petition. Dismissed.

The appellant shall be at liberty to raise all the contentions before the learned Single Judge at an appropriate stage. [SURYA KANT] JUDGE January 16, 2017 [SUDIP AHLUWALIA] mohinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2017.01.18 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh