Ikbal v. State Of Haryana And Others






IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8668-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.09.2023 Ikbal ......... Pe

oner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- None for the pe

oner.

Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No. 4 and 5. Detenue in person with L/SI Babita, 504, P.S. City Sohna. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) The present pe

on is for issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus for search and release of daughter of the pe

oner from the illegal custody of respondents No. 4 and 5.

2.

In compliance of order dated 02.09.2023 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, detenue is present in the Court and states that she is aged 21 years. State counsel submits that the pe

oner had also filed an FIR against private respondents in the State of U8ar Pradesh, as such, a Judicial Magistrate at Meerut had recorded the statement of detenue under Sec on 164 Cr.P.C. The inves gator has supplied a photocopy of the said statement to this Court, which is taken on record. 3.

Perusal of said statement reflects that she is staying voluntarily with respondent No.4-Vijay Kumar and now, they had performed marriage on 19.08.2023. However, detenue states that there is a error in the statement, in fact, the marriage had taken place on 29.08.2023.

4.

Be that as it may, since the detenue is major and she has liberty to stay wherever she wants to stay, therefore, no further order is required to be passed in the present pe

on and the same is disposed of. All pending miscellaneous applica ons, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 13.09.2023 Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2023.09.15 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.