Deepak Mangla v. Nanak Chand And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

LPA No.301 of 2016 Date of decision: 02.08.2016 Deepak Mangla ....Appellant

Versus

Nanak Chand and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate, for Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, for the appellant. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The instant appeal, under Clause X of the Letters Patent, has been preferred by the appellant, challenging judgment dated 03.02.2016 rendered by the learned Single Judge.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant states that judgment of learned Single Judge, whereby three months' time was granted to the competent authority to take a decision in the matter, has been complied with, therefore, this appeal has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.

3.

Disposed of as infructuous.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) 02.08.2016 JUDGE R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2016.08.05 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document