Janak Raj v. Neha Goyal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-4892-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.10.2024 Janak Raj ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Neha Goyal ... Respondent(s) CORAM :

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

Mr. Binderjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Archana Puhanian, Advocate and Mr. K.T. Rau, Advocate for the respondent.

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1.

Pursuant to the order dated 03.10.2024, an affidavit has been filed by the petitioner stating therein that expenses incurred on OPD are not reimbursable and only when there is hospitalization for more than 24 hours that the benefits of the medical policy can be claimed by the petitioner. 2.

Custody of the minor child has already been handed over to the respondent-mother as noticed in the order dated 25.09.2024. Even the issue of interim visitation right has been taken care of vide order dated 25.09.2024.

3.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that in view of the order dated 25.09.2024, the present revision petition has since been rendered infructuous.

4.

In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

Yogesh Sharma 2024.10.29 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

High Court Chandigarh

CR-4892-2024 (O&M) -25.

It is made clear that any observation made herein or in the orders passed by this Court shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO 28.10.2024 Yogesh Sharma Yogesh Sharma 2024.10.29 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

High Court Chandigarh