Sham Lal Sharma v. Sunil Kumar & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA No.3829 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision.02.11.2015 Sham Lal Sharma ......Appellant

Versus

Sunil Kumar and others ......Respondents

Present:

None for the appellant.

Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate for respondent No.1.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

There is no representation for the appellant at the time when the matter is called.

2.

The second appeal is dismissed for default of appearance and non-prosecution.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 02, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.11.04 12:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document