Jyoti v. Jasvir Singh Mundari
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.108 TA-1017-2024 Date of Decision: 10.02.2025 JYOTI ....Applicant
Versus
JASVIR SINGH @ MUNDARI .....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Lupil Gupta and Ms. Hardeep Gandhi, Advocate for the applicant.
Respondent proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 04.12.2024.
***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
!
"#$
$ %& ' & ' &
( ) *
& ) +
) , t is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 23.02.2019. Two children born from the said wedlock, are presently in the care and custody of the applicant. On account of the matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. However, besides the petition under Sonu 2025.02.10 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC
Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, filed by the respondent, there is no other litigation, arising from this matrimonial dispute between the parties. Also, it is submitted that the applicant has no source of earning. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that it is difficult for the applicant to commute a distance of about 190 kilometres, to defend the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, more particularly, while taking care of the minor children.
In view of the aforesaid fact situation and also considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, the transfer application is allowed and
!
"# $
$ & %& ' ' &
( )- $
$ %& ' . ) + .
%& ' )/, $ %& ' &
&
) (ARCHANA PURI) 10.02.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes Whether reportable :
Yes/No Sonu 2025.02.10 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC