Sushma Mahajan & ORS. v. Nirdosh Kumar And ORS

208 IOIN-FAO-5522-2011 SUSHMA MAHAJAN AND OTHERS VS.

NIRDOSH KUMAR AND OTHERS Present:- None for the appellants.

Ms. Ambika Luthra, Addl.A.G., Haryana for respondents No.2 and 3.

Mr. Navnit Sharma, Advocate For Mr. R.S. Dhull, Advocate for respondent No.4.

**** Perused. This IOIN has been put up on account of the fact that service upon respondent No.1 could not be effected for want of correct address. Respondent No.1 was driver of the offending vehicle, which was duly insured by the insurance company-respondent No.4 herein. In the premise, service upon respondent No.1 is exempted, at this stage. Service is thus complete.

IOIN stands disposed of, accordingly.

(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE January 16, 2023 ashish ASHISH 2023.01.17 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document