(O&M) Naranjan Singh v. Harpreet Kaur

COCP No.2161 of 2011 -1-


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP No.2161 of 2011 Date of Decision: 25.11.2019 Naranjan Singh Petitioner

Versus

Harpreet Kaur Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.

**** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

The contempt petition was filed pleading that respondentwife had backed out from her earlier statement dated 24.12.2010 made before the District Judge, Jalandhar. The grievance was that she had received
10 lakhs, thereafter refused to give statement for second motion under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. None has put in appearance for the petitioner. Even on the last date, petitioner was not represented. Learned counsel for the respondent-wife submits that matter is compromised and divorce by mutual consent is granted. In view of statement made, the contempt petition is disposed of.

PANKAJ BAWEJA 2019.11.26 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh

COCP No.2161 of 2011 -2However, petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the case, in case statement made by learned counsel for the respondent is found factually incorrect.

[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE November 25, 2019
    

         



    PANKAJ BAWEJA 2019.11.26 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh