Sis Kumar @ Amandeep v. Savita Rani And ANR

FAO No.2615 of 2018 ...1..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.2615 of 2018 Date of Decision: 09th January, 2020 Sis Kumar @ Amandeep ...Appellant

Versus

Savita Rani & Anr.

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr.R.D.Rattewal Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr.Sarju Puri, Advocate, for the respondent.

DAYA CHAUDHARY (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that a settlement has been arrived between the parties and even petition under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act has also been filed in which first motion statement has been recorded. The amount, as settled at the time of recording first motion statement, has already been paid.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, nothing survives in the present appeal and the same is hereby disposed of as having become infructuous. In case the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent is not found to be correct or the situation is otherwise SEEMA SHARMA 2020.01.14 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

FAO No.2615 of 2018 ...2..

then the appellant is at liberty to move an application for revival of the appeal.

(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 09.01.2020 seema Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SEEMA SHARMA 2020.01.14 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document