Surender Kumar And ORS v. State Of Haryana And Others
!"#" $% & '
()"*+
% ,- .
/ 0 /
! "
# $ %%%% 0 /
+ 1) *2% &'( )
*+$ , , !
!-. - /0# 12
'3
"$2$'
4$44$*4*4*' 523 0,'+326
4$3 0,'+32
!
7-
!
-
!! 8.
- -
8
$$#
8$2$' &$( ) /09 -
) 9 8 9
!
!
8
) 9 $$ $2$'9 8
:,
9 /0 # 1'
'3
"$2$'
4$44$*4* 5239
!! -
&4( ) 9
8!
&*( ;'*
$2$$
9
8
0!!
.
-
< !
-
-
9
-
$$#
8$2$' &5( )
' !$2$$
!
8!
9
&3( /!!=
,
!
"# !>
!"# $
&?( The Supreme Court in Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat and another, 2017 AIR (SC) 4843 laid down the broad principles governing the exercises of powers of quashing of FIR. It was held that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to be exercised by the High Court to secure the ends of justice, to prevent abuse of any process of law and in cases where in view of the compromise the possibility of conviction is remote and continuation of proceeding will cause oppression and prejudice. &+( )he parties are relatives. The parties have chosen the path of
forgive and forget in an attempt to save their relationship to whatever extent possible. No useful purpose would be served continuing with the trial. The continuation of trial would only hamper the steps taken by the parties to resolve the issues. There are bleak chances of conviction. To meet the ends of justice, the FIR mentioned above and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.
[9] The petition is allowed.
30 /
& '
()"*+
'@
-< A<#
$@
8! A<#