Rinku Kumar v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39190-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.09.2025 Rinku Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :
Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner
***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.
! "#$ %&% '
'( ' ) ! *&+ , -
' '+ ./
&2& ,. 34 56 7 '( ' ) 8 4!9:
;Petitioner prays for grant of pre-arrest bail in FIR No.313 dated 04.07.2025 registered under Sections 61(4) of the Haryana Amended Act, 2020 (The Punjab Excise Act, 1914) at Police Station Ladwa, District Kurukshetra. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the FIR in the present case was registered against unknown persons and the petitioner has been wrongly involved in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner was neither present at the place of occurrence nor he was owner of the cars, which were used in the crime nor he had any connection with the recovery of liquor from the spot. Learned counsel next submits that the petitioner was involved in one more case under the provisions of Gambling Act, but he is on bail in the said case. Notice of motion.
On the asking of Court, Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondentState. List on 23.09.2025.
MOHIT 2025.09.23 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-39190-2025 (O&M) -2In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation. In the event of arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of arresting/investigating officer subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C./482 (2) of BNSS, 2023."
% 3 - :- /<! 4 <!!! - <!!
! = -6 -<4 -
3 - -/!
<! !4 <!!! - ! =
! ) #<4 <4 1! - 4 '( ' )!!- - -
/ -
+ , * 4< - /
4 <!!! 4 = 4 -< ! -.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 23.09.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes / No Whether reportable :
Yes / No MOHIT 2025.09.23 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document