Bharat Bhushan And ORS v. Mandir Shri Hanuman Ji Maharaj

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.4667 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.12.2015 Shri Bharat Bhushan and others ... Appellants Vs.

Mandir Shri Hanuman Ji Maharaj, Jagadhari ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?

2.

To be referred to reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate for the appellants.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellants wants to withdraw the present Regular Second Appeal as after seeking the redemption of the mortgage, possession has been taken.

In view of the aforementioned statement made by learned counsel for the appellants, the present Regular Second Appeal which is against the dismissal of the counter claim, is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE December 03, 2015 savita SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2015.12.04 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh