Arjun Raju Ravichandran v. State Of Haryana
1-
!
"#$# %&%!'()*
& +, -. --
!!!
- */ ,0& "
# # $
# # %&'()* *)(++*+,
(+*-. /*0&1
23%-&&
+ "
%& 4
#
# 5
%$ 6 7
89 .$ 1 & 1 7 # 8-
3 : ;
< $47 $&" 3
: ;
<4 49 #4
2-
4
(,*( =
4 ( +* >( (),7-4 "
#
#
"
$
%&
# 4
-#
# #
5
(>-*?-+*+> , & # #
# 7 $ +?-*,-+*(? 4#@
7 (?-*0-+*+(A
4@ = "
4 7 $
+?*(+*++
7 9
4
7 "
7 $ 7 +B*++*++"
4
# # # #
1
3- # 4
$ 4 4 +B*++*++4
#
"
# #
4 . +B*++*++ # #
4 #
@ ' #
& #
#9 # -# / '
> 3
# 3
#
*,*,+*++ "
4 *,*,+*++ 4 "
"
4
#
#
%
4-
' 9 9
4
$ 9
C # #
# 4 ) &
#
? "
4 7 $ 7 # (,*(=
( +* >( (),7- #
4# $
+B*++*++ # *,*,+*++ 4
-
"
4 # $
#
9 # "
% #
The powers of anticipatory bail are extra ordinary and the same are to be exercised sparingly and in exceptional circumstances. The Court must be circumspect while exercising such power for grant of anticipatory bail and it should not be granted as a matter of rule and has to be granted only when the Court is convinced that exceptional circumstances exist to resort to that extra ordinary remedy. In the present case, no such exceptional circumstances
5warranting exercise of the powers for grant of anticipatory bail by this Court are existing. D 4 @ 4
&
# 4 Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
B & 4 # # # 9 0 #
1- 2 %!'()*