Raj Singh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21219-2024 Date of decision: 30.08.2024 Raj Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1.

Learned counsel would contend that the benefit of 2nd ACP has not been granted to the petitioner. In this regard, representations dated 11.09.2023 and 08.08.2024, Annexures P-6 and P-7, have been submitted however the same have yet not evoked any response. He thus, at this stage, on instructions, from the petitioners, prays that a direction is given to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time bound manner. 2.

Notice of motion.

3.

At the asking of the Court, Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and has no objection to the limited prayer made.

4.

In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representations dated 11.09.2023 and 08.08.2024, Annexures P-6 and P-7 expeditiously, in accordance with law.



(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 30.08.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No HAMANT 2024.08.30 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment