Kishan Chand & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Regular First Appeal No.2166 of 2015 Date of Decision: 03.08.2016 Kishan Chand and another ..Appellants versus The State of Haryana and others ..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Mr. Saurabh Arora, Advocate, for the appellants. Ms. Safia Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgment, dated 01.10.2010, rendered by this court, in Regular First Appeal No.1824 of 2006 (Sudama and others versus The State of Haryana and another), vide which this court had enhanced the compensation to Rs.1,520/- per sq.yard. Therefore, he submits that this appeal be also disposed of in terms of the said decision, particularly when, even the Special Leave Petition preferred by the State of Haryana, against the judgment, dated 01.10.2010, has been dismissed on 25.07.2011. The factual position, as set out above, is not disputed by the learned State counsel. She submits that let this appeal be disposed of in terms of the decision, rendered by this court, in the case of Sudama and others (supra).

Ordered accordingly.

03.08.2016 ( ARUN PALLI ) VK JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Virender Kumar 2016.08.04 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this docunt High Court Chandigarh