← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/39486/2025allowed

Sandeep Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

2025-10-13Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj9 pages



        CRM-M-39486-2025 

! "!"# SANDEEP KUMAR  



 STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS  

 $  %&$  '( '  ) *****    

 !

"

 #   !

 

 $ %  #&  '

( ) *  + '+##   !



"

 , ----- ( '  )+ , -./ .  *       

 +   

 /0 !  1  *"# % + %    2,  !

 3+ # ! 45 "

.6 .222/+  

./78 0. !1" 2, #      

   9 :

    '     

# :  

3+   

 #   #  !

  ; 

 .022/  9    :         ;!

  

  

 < =53 #    

  .6262/ !   <    #    

 #  # 

 

 ;:     

  # : !

 , + +      



  ;    !

  >+ #   .9<   

"

0,02..22/ 9  ?   ! 

  

+ +     

 

      

    



        !  "  # 

$  %   &

    ' (     "  # 

$  ) #   (

   

 

 

 (  )*+*)+), - .

  / 

 

      0   /  

  %     /

 $( 1  2

 









 



4 0

, , '

 

   







    5   

 





 1  

 &        .,56 7%  # 

$  6 #   (

    

  (   )*+*)+), 8

 









4' 



  

 

 ( 



 0 *

   

  

   /

9  + .

   

  4     

 



     4  )

  

 



 ),)87  -



       (

   

 0  @

    

  +  ! + ! 



#    

 *

+ ; 

   +

! +

#  

 5.

+ '+##  ppears on behalf of respondents No. 2 and 3 and reiterates the settlement and his concurrence to the FIR and all the other consequential proceeding being quashed. A 94+1  ! <  !:



     

       

 

  

 

!

""

 #

$%

; ;  +  ;)8!     / 

  /   /(

     

 <   ( 

28) 

$ !

/  

 (

(



   

  =   

 

  / == 



 % = )*'& '

(

  '

& '

 

 

 ) '* .;

 1  '/ >  /  

   

 ((?

:!

     %     / (        

/

  (     (   9 -+ !

(     %  

 /     /%  %   / '

 



/      /

<



 





  (

     <  

/  



(   /      (  

  

 



 % 

/ -     

    

 -)+*  

$ /

 

  (

 (

( 

28) 

$ -)!

  /

@    //  '



  %   

( 

 28)  

 $      

 (



  

   /  

 



  /  =     % = #

 (



       A  

   



 

 

   /    (

/

  / <   ( 

28) 

$

   

 /

(   

!

  /

  

 

<  

( /

   /       



 (

   %  /

(

  

       --!

/     

 

 



/  

$(

  

   (  

  

 28)



       

  

 ( (  @ 

    A       (







-)+ 

$  



  ( 



 %  -2 !

( 

 28)  

 $   < C<A# >    

      !

 

 <  

 

A     .   <     ( '

 ( (/  



 

 

A



     

 !

( 

 28)  

 $     .(

 .    ( <     /  (

  

 !

<   (   (





   !

  < A/ 

 

    !

  / 

     

   /A    /  /&

 

/(/     ( ( ( 



  



   

   (

     



 

  

  (     

  /(   /  9#

  :

!

3+ # !+# :  

;*)

B;+ <  !'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another,(2012)10 SCC303'. Still further, the broad principles for exercising the powers under Section 482 were summarized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and another" (2017) 9 SCC 641'.

8.

5        : !   ;  +

!  + 

#    

 +!+ +  :

+ ;   ;*

+

!

 #9!+   !

 #  %*  ;  : ! +            ;

  

 6 9 )

B; +  <       B"# + , , -

  &    *

$

 )



.!/0   :   ; #

C 

 + 

 :  +  + 

? ;    *



! !!  !+ 

+ + 3+ # !:  :

+

+;    <   3+45  : !   

  

#     9 ; 

!  )

B; + <  ?  + 

19. We thus sum-up and hold that as opposed to Section 320 Cr.P.C. where the Court is squarely guided by the compromise between the parties in respect of offences 'compoundable' within the statutory framework, the extra-ordinary power enjoined upon a High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution, can be invoked beyond the metes and bounds of Section 320 Cr.P.C. Nonetheless, we reiterate that such powers of wide amplitude ought to be exercised carefully in the context of quashing criminal proceedings, bearing in mind: (i) Nature and effect of the offence on the conscious of the society; (ii) Seriousness of the injury, if any; (iii) Voluntary nature of compromise between the accused and the victim; & (iv) Conduct of the accused persons, prior to and after the occurrence of the purported offence and/or other relevant considerations. .2 9!

 :

#  ! 

 #!

 + !  :+;3+  + # !



! : +  

/0 !1" 2,  8 

  + !    :    +     # #  

# + #  # + * 9    :

+ *+ ;* * 



3+ 

0 8  9 !!   3+

 

 ;     ; 

+

  !!   :

+ ;  % #   

   !   *

 +;    # 5   

 ; 

 

  % #

   !< D iii)  <

+

!  

 #   !

#      # # 

 

 # 

  %*   +;   * # +;   D iv)  9

 #  %*   !+  *!

: !    +

  !

 +

8  "

  #  +;  +  :

+ ;   ;*

+

!

 #D vi)     

 +!!   *

       

+#   * + 

     +

#   *  

! #  

!45 vii) 9

  

  %*   +

   ! 

 +

<

+

!

 #  %* ;  : !+  9 ;  !: :  :       !!   

  !+*

?    

* 11.

In view of the report of the >+  #    .9 <  a 

  :

;* ?< 1



-'

        $

$

 !!

:"# + ,

, -

  &   

$

 )

.!/ 

6 ;*4+1  ! < 



    -'

 

    *

!

""

 #

$%

  

   :9!

 FIR No.197 dated 10.07.2025 under Sections 125(a), 281 of the BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Model Town Panipat, District Panipat and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom - 5-678953+ 

  :

7

?+ /8 However, the same would be subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner with the Red Cross Old Age Home, , A/c No.50100286016319, IFS Code HDFC0004030, HDFC Bank, Sector 15, Panchkula, within two months from receipt of certified copy of this order. Petition is allowed.

  ,( '  )/   +"!"#    

 & % #= 



E="

& 

;  E="