Tarsem Singh v. State Of Haryana And Another
!"#"
$%&'&' (( '''
"
"
$ ) * )#+# (
'''
#, $ $
% -. ' ( ((..
((..
/'
0 .1
! ! " " #$%&'$()*+ (* ** ()*+ $,- . / $
*0& " 1! *&&*
, !
! - 0) ** ()(*2
- 2
)( )'
()((! ! -
-2
- ! )3 )% ()((
&(
!- - !
"!- *3 *) ()(( -
" (
, !
!
-
1
!)3 )% ()(( -
It is a case, wherein, the petitioner had been regularly appearing before the Court, but he could not appear on 02.05.2022, due to some unavoidable circumstances and therefore, his non-appearance on the said date was unintentional. The objective of the coercive mechanism prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure is to ensure that the accused remains present before the Court to receive the orders and judgments as are passed qua the accused. If the accused shows his sincere intention and desire to appear before the Court, then it would not be unjustified to protect him from being arrested. Though the petitioner absented himself from the Court proceedings, yet he is now not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes and rather, he is only to face the trial. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner to custody. 4 - - 5
! -
$6 7 ! *')))$8- 6 ,
9
7 ! $ $6 &'&' 0 ((..1 :
;
$ <= >$" ;
= >$"