Gurjot Singh Sidhu v. Raspreet Kaur
!!"#$#%&
& '( ) ) '(
) ) )
!
"
#
$#% !
! '''
) * (
!
#
! (+((( %*,
-
* .
# -% # / & &!
-* &#
& % ,
$
# #
(1 !!
. !#
/ 2 * %!.
1(1 3
,
# #
&# # #
* &
, *
! ! ! &#
*
++ 4
. * #
, %
&
&
# , * %
&# , ##* , !
. 5
, #
#
*!# &
*#
, &#
%& 1(1
* & & ! &# , ##* *, ! !.
# " , #
6 2
# ! % ,
, #
&! # # * % .
&# , ##*
8 ! #
#
*& # :3 # ( !
#
&# * 5
#
&# , ##* *
!
;
# ,
#.
# # "%
&# , ##*
& #
## , & # ,
!!
# , !!
*
&&
%, 4
" -
-% -
-%
&
! &#
++ # ! < # ,
1+ !
&
1(1 "%
, / , .
; *
& , &
., . &#
/
%
#
* & !
2 #* (1 !, #
* ,
-%
5
* , & ),
%
8((1
*!
!!
# %,
* ! " , # #
.
% #
-
&%
- ( 4
! ,= 9 4
1(1= 9 6 4
. &
% = 9 &> + & % ,
+,+
$
4-(
;#
# $
;#
& #
/ 4- % ,
4-( / ! !
!# 1 & !
!
!
*
#
! (+((( #
8 :
-* % ,
$
? @ !
# #
! (+((( *
!
! !
!
) %#
!
, %& $ (1 % ! &
&
$ (1
# % # # #
!
&
!
A?- 1 7
&! ;! #
!
%
- % %
% " ! !##
*
. #
" & # * %
*,
+-+ *. %
! ! ,
B
&
*
! ,
*#
!##
#
% ) &, # !
!
.!!%/01#.!!12/01# 1 CD
++?E /)3#%#.$ . !!4 (6 C+D
1E )530$0.60$0 8 CD
+(( 7#%8!3)#%70. 9:#%8!3/23 2%9;%836%#70 23
:9- -( (8 !
A( A @ !
%
%
& !
*, & 5 !
!
" &
% & # #
# % # & %
!# *!.
! % ,
#& &
%
( 4 *
* !&, ! !
#,
-* ! 9 ( 8
*&
.
# ! %,
!#
; -( -8 !
++ %
((
; -( -8 % !
#
. !
#. && -! * % *
*
!
# !*,
(( *
* ! %
! &%
#
-
4
! #=
4
#
5
&
= (
* *
!
!
%
-%
- !## !
=
& , !
& -% !## !
:7
H &# , ##*
&
/&
!##
, &
!
(6 C(D -D Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ['for short 'the Act'] %
) !, ! ! !
+<+ & #
G # # I! ,J
&
!
# *!
# *
#
# I! ,J
!# " J* ;
% "
D " J*
#
% &
9;& , &
K! ,K E E
! ;
%"0.$ 5 3$08* =-110;8, %
*
- #
! #
!
!
&& * *
! &! % #, #
& )0;0 %#.$ 802>3
!88#*=??
)-* %
I! ,J
!
(6C(DC -D !
* " J* ;
&
I! ,J # !
&
, #, , !
7&
, !
*# #
5 &!
7&
*# && ! , * # ,
#
& % .
!!
!
&&!
!#
) ! % !
!#
&
* %&
#!
&&!
5
! ! *
!
&
+?+ #
(6
@07 .$07 *==, )<*
" K* ;
5 #
! *
% #&
5 #
! % K# ! ,K #
!
(6 C(D -D !
* ! *, &
!
%
& ! , !
&&
% #.
* , )
&& , # !
!
*, ;! # ! % , !
*, . ! !
,
3.!!% !0 .$%8!39# !0 * -)<
&
* *
!
* !
! , #
& % &# &! !# ! #
&# !
5
# #
! !
, % * !
% , 7& &# !
* H
& !
# , % #
!
!
* %& !
! ,
%
+=+ #.
&
!
&# ,
& !#
!
%
&!
!
( ;#
!
*
%
#
5 -* -% #. ! ! , # % . * # ! %
&
&
*
&
&! , ! 4 #
% &!
#&
*;
) 4-( 4- %
% && B;4-(H 4-H !
, # %, ;#
-
-! & "%
!-;#
4-( #
. ! ! !
&
! #
#
% , &&!
#. !
3 !
!
*
! .
& #
4-( &&!
*,
!
!! 4- !
!
#* ! %#
#. ! !
! !
#* #
++ *
&&
#. ! !## !
(+
#
&# # #
#
& * !
, % #
*
# 4-( 4- %
!
*
5
!
##
*
&
&
(1
& -% !## !
,
&# , ##*
&
*
:7
!
1 FA?- 7
! !
.
KK ! !, !
*
:7 26 11(8
!
1 A?- 7
27
.
K/K !,
2+A (8
!
.
K K !,
2+ (A
" #
! *
% ! !
!# !
%,
! ) !# %%!A23! + !,
#
(8+(8 % ;!
&
++ "
H
2
H . ) / *,
( ! % & -
-%
* % .
!
% ! # ?H- &# * "
# , %%!A23!
+
!, #
;!
?+(A
& 2
/
H *
/ )
H < #
H
/ *, #
% *
-%
# ( !
*, % !
( ! # , %%!A23!
+
!, AA(
2+ (A C!,
.
K KD
"
# % %
# 2
)
% #
%%!A23!+
&
.
& #
%
#
&
# &# &
%%!A23!+,
!, #
2 (8
# $
!
(8
!!
!#
.
K/K
.
K K %%!A23!$+ +,F %%!A23!+*
, #! !
&# (8 (A %
%
,
*
*!.
-
# %%!A23!+ %%!A23!+
++ & # H % & -
-%H* .
%
!
# ,
&
&# !# * #
%%!A23!
+* *
# 2
)
&
!
,
# , #
&
"
% , #
; -(
!
&
#
; - !
*&
*, !! !!
!#
&
*
!# , ! !
;
;! %%!A23!+ %%!A23!+ # *, !
! %
-% #
* ,
#
5 & #
!,
) !
!
!
#
!
!
%& # *!
&# , ##* ! ,
(? !
&
*
! ! #
:7 26 (8
&! &
!
:7 &
:7
!
++ ! !# ! % * !!
&!
* -#
!
!5 2 # ,
#
!5
*,
&
, 9* ,
*, *
! % # * :7 &
:
& !
!## !
&&
! % % %
Vishwanath Agrawal vs. Sarla Vishwanath Agrawal, (2012) 7 SCC 288; K. Srinivas vs. K. Sunita, 2014 (16) SCC 34; Rashi Kakkar vs. Harminder Singh Bindra, 2018 (4) CCC, 475 (P&H); Satyawan vs. Rekha, 2017 (Suppl) CCC, 169 (P&H); Jagwati vs. Gajender Kumar, 2017(Suppl.) CCC, 751 (Delhi); Meenu Devi vs. Amit Kumar, 2018(4) CCC, 612 (Jharkhand); Neetu Aggarwal vs. Gireesh Gupta, 2011 AIR (Del) 101 and Narain Prasad Saraswat vs. Shaifali alias Muniya, 2016 SCC Online All 2651 and K. Srinivas Rao's case (Supra). 7
% !
# ! -% !## !
&# , ##*
#
!
& &
!# #
!,
.
+,+ #,
&
#
%&
% , *!# *
(A 2% !#
5 % -%
1(1
&
!
, !
!
(6 C(D -*D !
#
#
&.
*
K
* !
* #
("05% 5"0%8 /#341%#@!3$2$ !!%1#$ 7 (A1
/ " K* ;
% !
#
#, &! #
#
* H * H !
* !
# #
#
! # ,
#
,
# $ % # & #
*!.
7 !
#& % %
%
##
! "
!# *!.
& 1(1 2 #
#
*
# & ! # 4-( 4- !
&&
%
+-+ ! %
!
, *
&
&# ! # * &&!
!## !
% , , & #
%
#
*!.
B
&
* , ,
, &# #
, * ,
!
)
* -
)
!! * %,
% , ! !# # # & B
-
%
,
. #
& #
&!
! ;
7 is abundantly clear that the marriage between the parties has broken down irretrievably and there are no chances of their living together again. Undoubtedly, the irretrievable break down of marriage is not a ground for divorce under Section 13 of the Act. However, the Hon'ble Apex Court in a catena of decisions while dealing with the facts and circumstances of individual cases has observed that when there is no possibility of resumption of normal marital life by the spouses and marriage between them has irretrievably broken down, a decree of divorce should be granted. No doubt, it is obligation of the Court that marital status should as far as possible be maintained but when the marriage is totally dead, in that event nothing is
++ gained to keep the parties tied forever to a marriage which infact has ceased to exist. There is total disappearance of emotional substratum in the marriage between the parties. 4 &
%
! ! %
%
!
*
!
! !
& 4 &
!
*
% &! ;
%
! !!
, %
-% !## !
&,
,
! !
#
% !!
, ( : *
# #
! (+(((
2"
H+H(A
%
.
! !
!! , # * %
! ! * % !
)
# 4 .
H LH2 4 * LH2