Sumer Singh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.26700 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.30.09.2019 Sumer Singh

...Petitioner

Vs State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

Present:

Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 2nd respondent-Director Secondary Education, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to consider the legal notice dated 25.05.2019 (Annexure P-4) within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct 2nd respondent-Director Secondary Education, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to consider the legal notice dated 25.05.2019 (Annexure P-4) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon, failing which respondent No.2 shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to the petitioner.

This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner running from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of non-compliance of directions issued by this Court. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 30, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.10.