High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/9717/2022disposed of

Deeksha And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others

2022-10-12Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.116 CRWP No.9717 of 2022 Date of Decision: 12.10.2022 Deeksha and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Talim Hussain, Advocate, for the petitioners.

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) By way of the instant petition, both the petitioners seek the indulgence of this Court for the issuance of a direction to respondents No.1 and 2 to protect their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of respondents No.3 to 5 because they (petitioners) are living in relationship. It has also been mentioned in this petition that a representation (Annexure P-4) has already been moved to respondent No.2 in this regard. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, has appeared on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 in this case in pursuance of the copies of the present petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioners restricts his prayer to the issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 to look into and take appropriate action on the said representation of the petitioners, i.e Annexure P-4. Learned State counsel has no objection for the same. NEETU RANI 2022.10.12 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, Chd

CRWP No.9717 of 2022 -2- .....

Keeping in view the intent of the fundamental right as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India which ensures the protection of life and liberty to the citizens as well as the above-discussed limited prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting or expressing any opinion on the legality and validity of the relationship between the petitioners, respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, S.A.S. Nagar Mohali, is hereby directed to look into the afore-said representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners genuinely deserve any protection, then to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

However, it is clarified that this order shall not be construed to be a shield to the petitioners against any civil or criminal action/proceedings already initiated or intended/contemplated to be initiated against them by any competent authority/person on account of their afore-said relationship and permissible under the relevant provisions of law. This petition stands disposed of accordingly. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 12.10.2022 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2022.10.12 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, Chd