Ravi v. State Of Haryana
! " # "
"$%& '&()*)+,
-!. / 0
!
"
# 0 2 . $
%
&'() ) *
* % ! +,- '(.
//0// *
'0/1'021'&1/031/41'2(1&, )
/51/2
!
3 6 77 / +, *
%
* *
!
"
# $$#$$
%%#
&
'
&
& '
&
() * + ,
-
(
& ! '
.
/ / ,
!
. !
0 ! !
. (!
!
( 1"
/
2
1
3 3 , 4 , ( '
"
! !
!
!
, 5
1"2
1 (
- (
(!
! (
6 7
.
7
8'3 9: ::;%/<:= '
)
!
!
has been filed. The same is taken on record. As per the custody certificate, the petitioner is behind bars for more than 1 year and 1 month.
It is being claimed by the prosecution that on 12.12.2022, the complainant made a supplementary statement claiming that his son has been murdered by Rambir, Virender @ Kuku, Ravi Kumar, Deepak and Jasbir @ Jassa along with others. The petitioner is stated to have suffered a confessional statement while in police custody which reads as under :-
!! + + )
, *
!
! ( !'
&
! (
(
! (! + ! ( (> < :
'
!
! ( (
!
(
! !
!
3 # $$#$$
(
(!
.
(
5 +
'
+ !
. *
* ? +
! + ?
!
)( !
@
6 )
+
2 )
.
!!
(
" *
* !
( !
5
(
-
!
.
(
!
! , -(
! ("
@
6. +
)(
! (
!
5 !
, !
!. (
(
6 , !
('
" ! +
,
(+ !
1
+
:!
*
* !
!
@
6 )
+
2 )
)(
,
.
(
!+
( 2+7 ;,7 ;;<%!
, !!
" !
! ! = Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the aforesaid confessional statement, while in police custody, made by the petitioner would not be admissible in evidence yet even if the same is taken on its face value, the same does not disclose that the petitioner is in any manner connected to the occurrence.
Learned State counsel on instructions from Investigating Officer submits that the allegation against the petitioner is of having conducted reiki and apart from that Swift Car stands recovered.
&
,
!
*
*
! .
*
!
!
% *!!
*!
!
" %
%
8
$
%
%
* % 1
%
!
9$ ) 1# *
( -
* %
%
%
! 0
"
,
'6
7 :
" *1
;
:
%
-