Mahender Singh v. State Of Haryana

-
-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.04.2023 

  ....Petitioner

Versus

   

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Kanwar, Advocate and Mr. Saurabh Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana.

HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C is for grant of concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.205 dated 12.09.2022 registered under Section 306 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal code, at Police Station Sadar Bahadurgar, District Jhajjar, Haryana.

On 05.01.2023, the following order was passed by this Court :-
 

        

     

      

 !" # !$ ! %& '(#)*   !+

,

   *

    -  *.

 / 00*1  2  

     3



           +                3  4

3

 

   3

 

             3   

     

 

3   (  0*,  

   (4 

 



--

3

 

 

       4    

    

     

,3  

   

  *, 

4* 

      

 



3



 3   *  4 ,



3  *  5   4 







         3 2   

    

 3



    4

 



      

  *, ,  4  . 6    

#!



 

     ##! ! *      

    

3



  

  ##! ! *

     

         

 

3    ,        %       3    .7&  - 5  ,

       ) 2'3   3   2   

    

  

 

      , 

0 

 4

   2    

  

     * 5   4,

   4 

  * ,4   

 

  2     4 2

  !  ! 



3 , * 

4 



    *



   3 

     



4

  8&

   9  1,4*   

  0 

  4

    ,   

 4

     



 3     ,     % ):

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ravinder Kumar has not disputed the aforesaid fact of joining of investigation by the petitioner and submits that his custodial interrogation is not required at this stage.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his

-- custodial interrogation is not required at this stage, the present petition is allowed and the ad-interim order dated 05.01.2023 passed by this Court is made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

It is made clear that if the petitioners fail to comply with any of the bail conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner.

Nothing expressed here-in-above shall be construed to be an observation on merits of the case and the facts and circumstances recorded above are only for consideration of the prayer for anticipatory bail at this stage.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

27.04.2023 (HARSH BUNGER) Amandeep JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No