Deep Chand v. Ram Mehar And ORS




    
  

 Date of decision: 21st January, 2014  Deep Chand  Appellant

Versus

Ram Mehar and others  Respondents   

   

 
  

   1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the appellant.

Mr. Balwan Singh, Advocate for Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5.

 

  !"

# Vakalatnama of Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate on behalf of respondents No.4 and 5 has been filed in Court. As per the office report, notice to respondent No.3 could not be issued as counsel for the appellant has not filed the correct address of the aforesaid respondent.

As per the further report, respondents No.1, 2 and 6 to 10 have been served. However, none has put in appearance on their behalf. Thus, they are ordered to be proceeded against ex5parte. No one is present on behalf of the appellant. Dismissed in default.

 "

 

  #   $%&$'(!)
 Singh Rattan Pal 2014.01.24 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court