Mian Mohammad & ANR v. Union Of India & ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 1714 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.5.2016 Mian Mohammad and Farid (deceased) through his LRs .. Appellants Vs.
Union of India and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present:
Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the applicant-appellants.
***** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J. (Oral) CM No. 5318-CI-2016 Applicants seek condonation of delay of 2935 days in filing the appeal.
Notice of the application.
At this stage, Mr. Varun Issar, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 3.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Additional A.G. Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, instant application is allowed for the reasons stated therein. Delay of 2935 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. However, it is made clear that the applicant-appellants shall not be entitled for interest for this delay of 2935 days, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Imrat Lal and others Vs. Land Acquisition Collector and others, 2015 (2) RCR (civil) 437.
CM stands disposed of.
CM No. 5319-CI-2016 Applicants seek leave of the Court to file appeal on behalf of AMIT KUMAR 2016.05.12 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
RFA No. 1714 of 2016 (O&M) the legal representatives of Late Farid-appellant No.2, on the basis of particulars given in para 2 of the application. After hearing learned counsel for the applicants, instant application is allowed for the reasons stated therein, however, subject to all just exceptions. Leave sought is granted.
CM stands disposed of.
RFA No. 1714 of 2016 Learned counsel for the appellants submits that present appeal is squarely covered by the order dated 17.2.2016 passed by this Court in RFA No.2902 of 1999 (Union of India and another Vs. Major Pritam Singh and another).
Notice of motion.
At this stage, Mr. Varun Issar, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 3.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Additional A.G. Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record of the case, present appeal has been found squarely covered by the order dated 17.2.2016 passed in Major Pritam Singh's case (supra).
In view of the above, instant appeal is ordered to be disposed of in terms of the order dated 17.2.2016 passed in Major Pritam Singh's case (supra).
Disposed of, accordingly.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ) JUDGE 11.5.2016 AK Sharma AMIT KUMAR 2016.05.12 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document