Lakhvir Singh Alias Lakhveer Singh Alias Khiri v. State Of Punjab



   
     




# $%&%!'(

*+,  * - *+,  * - +

)))) %%!' .

, .&/&

-  

))) &0!'# '

( 1* ) -
 -,   














-,  ) )2.

CRM-49760-2025





!"#

$%


"&"'


 






( "&"!

*

+
,- .!/

"

0


1




1

2

-
.!

3


 



-

'

4






5#'

$%


"&"'
 





067
% )"


" "&"5






3

03


"
""
% , 
")

%


5"

!".





 ##

6+
,

""'
$% /
2

 8*/







2





"

















 



1

*



 

 

!

$








" "&"5

  !&
 
 6
+13

2



2




7
21
03
2

 


1


 



3 

,/
 
*

:
;

-

-  

1 



+
<
03
*
2
1
 

*
2

1



1



3


4*
*








3
2
< =

3
03
>2*
2

 

1  






*



2
 8*

 
4
1
2



 

8
2 







067
4


* 






2

1
2

 9


3 

2

2
!
1
 
'!&

-




2

?&&
 -
 
2

!
1 

13
>
"
1 
 13
%3
2


1 

13
<
2

5'
3 
:
##



!



*2



1* 

% $.&5@.(5#
2
2
3


A 
*


*
2
8
2



1*



0



*
1


2
1 *

*



1




'

















0
*
2

1


2






4 

0

2




2

 
1

 




?'
+ +

 

(










 
*
1
+.
1*


9




0
2

1*

 
*
 


*

+



( "&"!



- 





*

" "&"5


1 
 




4



1 


!?
2

*


*

2

 -1








3*

3


1
 




2





 








*
1 

1

1




"

 +



 *
1
 

*
1  


'?


%
6




 






1


+7 ."?)5
 "&"'
B
- '# 0 -%'56

-

/'7 

&!

&!

"&"'
+77.?#!
 "&#
,AC /.
,%$9:

+ /.

-

/'7 8


'

&# "&#
+7 5&")

"&#
+ ;3 &6

-

/'7 8


&( &!

"&!
+7 ?'"

"&"!
 &&/ ;

<  &/.

;

-

/'7 8

 &5 &5 "&"!


1

>D 
1
+


 

 ,+ /
%
,/ "?##;"&"'
B
 '# !'# < 86 :

!'#

6

5

















= &  '5 3> 1

>D 
1
+


+1
 % 5##';"&"!
.
- '!&6  ?

,&)

66 %&5 .6  '.) 
 5  "&"!

,"&""/
&
++
!"
-  '# .

+/;

'%3 ,&)
'.

/.

/

'@ &%5 %!'

?

A










 




 




  

&!
1

6

2














8.

Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2023 Live Law (SC) 533, Rabi Prakash v. State of Odisha has held that prolonged incarceration, generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution and in such a situation, the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo created under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. To the same effect is the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2024 (4) RCR (Criminal) 172, Ankur Chaudhary v. State of Madhya Pradesh 2023 AIR(SC) 1648, Mohammad Muslim alias Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi) in which Hon'ble Supreme Court while granting regular bail to an accused, from whom commercial quantity of contraband was recovered, has held that grant of bail on the ground of undue delay in trial cannot be said to be fettered by Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

A co-ordinate Bench of this Court has also held so in judgment reported as Law Finder Doc Id #2770222 Garpawandeep Singh alias Bihari v. State of Punjab decided vide judgment dated 27.08.2025 passed in CRM-M-19408 of 2025 wherein 260 grams of heroin was allegedly recovered. Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No.12788/2023 titled Nandalal Mondal alias Abhay Mondal v. The State of West Bengal, vide judgment dated 03.01.



















consideration the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner/under- trial, the fact that he does not have any criminal antecedents and also keeping in view the prolonged incarceration, ordered release of the petitioner on bail who was found in possession of 10,000 ml of codeine phosphate - a cough syrup which falls within the commercial quantity. Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.4883/2025 titled Santosh Pawar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Anr. (supra), has held that appellant who was being prosecuted for being in possession of commercial quantity of narcotic substance was entitled for bail in view of her incarceration for a period of 19 months.

In Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra), prolonged incarceration and inordinate delay engaged the attention of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, which considered the correct approach towards bail, with respect to several enactments, including Section 37 of NDPS Act. The Court expressed the opinion that Section 436A of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (which requires inter alia the accused to be enlarged on bail if the trial is not concluded within specified periods) would apply.

6





2




! 1



'&'
1

1
*



* 
" "&"5


1

 


*
 













 3


1







 *
1  

*
1 



'?


%

 







*








*


'?


%
+.
1*





0
2

1*

 
*


(




















*

+



( "&"!

    1







1




 





2




2

2
*
>D 
1 +

"&","/
++
'#"
.

%?

.% ,&)



'# '.)  "&"&,/
7+7
,+1/
#'
 /3 '

!6#) ;%.

&6 #% ,&)

))

'# 6 .&)

4
3





1
 







2

2

.1

2 6
1







2

 
*
3

 
*

*




2



 











*


 


4
+;

*




1
 
>2 




1



1*

1 *


+;

*




1

*
 2
 .

,/



1






1

,/



1
2
*
 


1*

 

,/


*




+


2
 11
*


1

2



, /






*
2


+

, /




*
1
*



&

6




*





 

1*

1
*


+


*
 






 *

*





2-,  4

 

;

'# 0 E
3;

F;% E
7 

F;%