Dalip Kaur And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

 
  
 




!"

# !

$%& '

%"(%

'%" '

 ) **

++  ,-

'

.*/ 1

 **  23+

3  ) 1

 "/   ,-



  '

./ 1

 **  23+

3  ) 1

 "/   ,-

  % 4* 1

 **  23+

3  ) 1

 "/   ,-

    4* 1 **  23+

3  ) 1

 "/  
"%6

7&8

6"+ $!3 

'





 



  






 


!

"#$%& #$'&(

"#!&&$#$'$' 


)

"#&%'!&#$'$


 
 !

"#&*'((#$'$'

'

:

$+,  .- & 

+




 
,
 

 











 







-



"#$%& # $'&(


.







,


$



,





 $$*/$$0


" 

1

 


,


 
  

 +


 

+

-

 

,

,,

/
+,

2&%3


 
,

4 

,

-
,

 56 

56
.



1







 


 ,




7+ 


,
8 

9
:

,
"

1+
;






-
,

-
  






,
" 

 

<= 



" 

1
-

 

+
+


) 5&65$656

> 
11
" 
>

"

7  
-


# #
+ -





+
1






,





-


 




  ,
,



,
 


+ 


-
 

 


,,



,
8 

) 5 6
 "

7 
5"76
>

!

?
 





-
 






 




4 -

-


+
-
 :
;


" 

"#& )))#&((!


@ 
7
>





A


'( &$ $''!
5 .


#&$6
,
 ,



-


 
)

,
7  * &0
<









+
 !()&#)$#$''(

+ 


+

'( &$ $''!
,

-
<=

.

" 



+

&0 $'&0
5 .


#& 6 
 


-

 

-


 

+
-




56

)

Learned State counsel while referring to short reply dated 22.03.2023 submits that in view of the representation for grant of family pension, the office of the respondent No. 3 issued a letter dated 18.03.2019 (Annexure R-1) to the office of the Accountant General, Punjab i.e. respondent No. 2 and in response to the same, respondent No. 2 replied through letter dated 29.05.2019 (Annexure R-2), wherein it is stated that family pension is admissible to those employees, who were alive on 01.01.2006 or were drawing pension on 01.01.2006. Further, in the reply dated 20.10.2022, as per the stand taken by respondent Nos.3 and 4 in para No.10, it was mentioned that after decision of the judgement dated 17.08.2017 (Annexure P-13) by the Apex Court, the respondent No. 3 and 4 sought clarification from respondent No. 2 vide their letters dated 18.

03.

 the remarks that government has not decided regarding the pensionary benefits for the service rendered in PSTC and that Punjab Govt. has also not issued any instructions regarding finalization of pensinary benefits of retirees, who were merged in the PSTC.

*

1



 





 
 
 



<B 




" 

"



!()&
 !()$

$''(

&0 $'&0
;-



+
<B 



 " 



 -
,


,
++

 



-


,

* &0




"

7 



+

<B 




" 
 
#

  



                                 

    

              !"# $    "



       %


!"#&'(  )    *         

   *                  

+

         



        

" &,(- *                                             *        *  

     

 *  .

  $      /   $

     

      

  *        

*   

             



       

 

         

   "0*    +

1

  

  1           

  

&(        



             

2  

&(      



         



                

        "

&#()   1



 





;   

                 &("  -        &(               



      

34% $ 

*   

 

   % $ 

      

                 .

 $  / $

  

+

  *   *  

   

 "5 ,"4          

       !"#             !"#&,(&("4

                 *       

          

                  

      

  

        !"#&#(   1  * 1

 

"

#")



    "6 $   

   7"'8      %

7"'8"        % &(     $*         '9 ':7;2 &($*       #< 9':7;      6  $ ':7; $ 0 "5 ;"4  

      

   7"'8&("=  6 $ 

                 

   "    

                     

 6 $    

     "

!"    

    "   

 

  "

7"

    

    

  

     

 

 

  > ',?

       

           "

8"$

  

 

  "

@"  

"5


" 



 




,
 


!








+
- 
<=

.
" 
,
+

-
 
 -


 9



+


 




$ +



-


 


 -
, ,


'& '& $''*
,
,+


'& '& $''*
,



 -




!


$

 +
 

+
,
+

 #

+
-
 <=

.
" 
,


 -



!




 


,
9

 



 ++

-





 "

+
 

+

<=

.
" 




 

,  -



+


-



 

, 

-

<=

.
" 

 
7=

5

6

 


"
;


" 

 


,


+
"
 &)00$#$'')


@< 
C 
>



 A



$'

'$ $'&(






"

& )))# &((!


'( &$ $''!

(

1
,


 
-





 4 -

-



+

'( &$ $''!
5 .


#&$6



 
7=

5

6



-

<=

.
" 


+

&0 $'&0
5 .


#& 6


 

,



,





&'


+


56

-

56
 


,'

'%-

$!'

++   
 9+/
 D

7  
 D