Yograj Sharma v. State Of Punjab
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-51483-2021 Date of decision-18.04.2022 Yograj Sharma
...Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ BAJAJ
Present:
Mr. Karanjeet Singh Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
*** MANOJ BAJAJ, J. (Oral) Petitioner has approached this Court under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure to seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.50 dated 27.02.2021 under Sections 379-B, 411, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station City Faridkot, District Faridkot, who apprehends his arrest at the hands of Police.
On 10.12.2021, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel contends that no one was named in the FIR and after arrest of the co-accused, mobile snatched from the complainant has already been recovered. He further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated subsequently on the basis of the disclosure suffered by the said co-accused and the petitioner is not involved in any other case of similar GEETA RANI 2022.04.19 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-M-51483-2021 -2nature.
Notice of motion for 18.04.2022.
Meanwhile, the petitioner shall join the investigation and would come present as and when called for and in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be admitted to interim bail on his furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that in compliance of the above order, the petitioner associated himself in the investigation and cooperated during interrogation.
Learned State counsel who is instructed by ASI Beant Singh states that indeed the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation for the time being. Considering above, the petition is allowed and the interim bail granted by this Court vide order dated 10.12.2021 is made absolute. (MANOJ BAJAJ) JUDGE 18.04.2022 geeta Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes No Whether Reportable :
Yes No GEETA RANI 2022.04.19 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document