Punyamanthula And ANR v. State Of Ut Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-47050-2022 Date of Decision:-22.12.2022 PUNYAMANTHULA AND ANR ... Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH ... Respondent -.-
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH -.- Present:- Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharian, Addl. P.P. UT Chandigarh.. Mr. Jaiveer Singh, Advocate for the complainant.
-.- KARAMJIT SINGH , J. (Oral) The counsel for the petitioners stated at bar that he has no further instructions from the side of the petitioner to argue the matter. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner In view of the above, present petition is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
( KARAMJIT SINGH) 22.12.2022 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?
Yes / No Whether reportable?
Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2022.12.23 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order, judgment and documents.